Kidney fibrosis models built for translational precision

Renal fibrosis is where most antifibrotic candidates stop working

Fibrosis is the final common pathway of chronic kidney disease (CKD): progressive deposition of extracellular matrix replaces functional nephron tissue, driving an irreversible decline in renal function. It accounts for most of the progression toward end-stage renal disease, yet no antifibrotic therapy has reached full approval in CKD to date. The gap between preclinical efficacy and clinical translation remains the field’s central problem.

That gap is rarely about the biology alone, it’s just as often about model choice: an induction method that fails to reproduce the human injury pattern, a study window too short to capture true fibrotic remodeling, or endpoints that don’t align with what a clinical trial will actually measure. Model selection is the first translational decision in any antifibrotic program.

Model selection, at a glance
Fast mechanistic screenUUO
Systemic, function-linked CKDAdenine diet
AKI-to-CKD transition    Unilateral IRI
Diabetic kidney disease     STZ
Glomerular disease, immune-driven CKDIgA Nephropathy

Which kidney fibrosis model fits your program?

A side-by-side view of NEPHRIX Biosolutions validated in vivo models: induction route, time to fibrosis, and the readouts each one supports.
ModelSpeciesInductionTime to fibrosisKey readoutsBest suited for
UUO - Unilateral Ureteral ObstructionMouseSurgical ligation of one ureter7 - 14 daysCol1a1, α-SMA, hydroxyproline, F4/80Fast antifibrotic efficacy screening
Adenine Diet-Induced CKDMouse / RatOral adenine-containing diet3 - 6 weeksGFR, BUN/creatinine, tubulointerstitial fibrosisSystemic CKD with functional decline
STZ-Streptozotocin-Induced DKDMouse / RatSingle/multi-dose STZ injection8 - 16 weeksAlbuminuria, glomerulosclerosis, mesangial expansionDiabetic kidney disease programs
Iga NephropathyMouseImmune-mediated glomerulonephritis inductionVariable, chronicIgA deposition, proteinuria, glomerular injuryGlomerular disease, immune-driven CKD
IRI Ischemia-Reperfusion InjuryMouseUnilateral renal pedicle clamping (ischemia) followed by reperfusion4 - 8 weeksKIM-1, NGAL, Col1a1, α-SMA, tubular injury scoreAKI-to-CKD transition, nephroprotection

Kidney Fibrosis in vitro assay, the DuoXProx™

Our proprietary renal co-culture system mimics epithelial-fibroblast crosstalk for more predictive in vitro fibrosis signal than monoculture assays.

  • Co-culture system: Reconstitution of the original cellular environment using Human primary cells
  • Customizable stressors: Hormonal, Diabetic, Nephrotoxic or Hypoxic stressors availiable
  • Multi-parameters analysis: Intracellular or secreted proteins quantification, gene expression, oxydative stress analysis.
  • High-content imaging & biomarker analysis: Automated quantification of fibrosis markers on our CX7 CellInsight platform allowing consistent, blinded, image-based scoring.

Kidney fibrosis models — common questions

There isn’t a single “best” model, it depends on your question. UUO is the fastest and most reproducible for early antifibrotic screening. The adenine diet model better reflects systemic CKD with functional decline. Unilateral IRI is preferred when you need to study the AKI-to-CKD transition. We help you choose based on your compound’s mechanism and your program’s stage.

It’s model-dependent:

  • UUO produces marked tubulointerstitial fibrosis within 7 – 14 days
  • The adenine diet model typically requires 2 – 4 weeks
  • Unilateral IRI takes longer, 4 to 8 weeks, to show progressive fibrosis and GFR decline, reflecting its slower, more clinically relevant disease course

UUO  model is a surgical, obstruction-driven model producing fast, localized fibrosis in one kidney. UUO is ideal for rapid mechanistic screening. The adenine diet model is dietary and systemic, inducing bilateral kidney injury with measurable functional decline (GFR, creatinine), making it closer to progressive human CKD.

Core readouts include collagen deposition (hydroxyproline, Masson’s trichrome), fibrosis-related gene and protein expression (Col1a1, α-SMA), tubular injury markers (KIM-1, NGAL), and functional markers such as GFR, serum creatinine and BUN, combined with quantitative histopathology.

No, in vitro assays serve different purposes. In vitro assays like our DuoXProx™ co-culture system are well suited for early mechanism-of-action work and dose-response screening. In vivo models remain necessary to confirm efficacy in a physiological, systemic context before moving toward IND-enabling studies.

Why choose NEPHRIX Biosolutions?

X

    For further information, contact us

    * : mandatory field